Imagining Ronaldo and Bale Together at Real Madrid (Deadly Stuff)
By Jerrad Peters on April 13, 2013
I agree with the author .
If Real Madrid could sign Gareth bale they would have the most deadliest squad ever.Imagine the intimidation factor for a goalie coming into a game knowing he has to face some of the 2 most deadliest forwards in soccer . It would be like a guy who has never fought in his life , fighting a pro boxer . That kind of intimidation.think about how big Ronaldo and Gareth Are . He says " Bale is 6'1" and still filling out, while Ronaldo is slightly taller and already viewed as one of the most powerful forwards in Spain. Then there is the burly Karim Benzema, who is just a touch shorter than Ronaldo but the shape of a fridge. Few defenders would be able to deal with the three of them, and one of the trio would typically have considerable space to himself as a result."that would be the most powerful group of attackers ever. Think about all the shots that would be taken by Real Madrid . Gareth bale has take 128 shots . He says " He has also taken an incredible 128 shots"the more balls the goalie has to chase the more goals will land. Think about the publicity for this team . They already have Ronaldo but know Gareth bale ! That would be insane ! This is why they need to sign Gareth bale .
Sunday, April 21, 2013
Saturday, April 6, 2013
current connection ban the killer robots
Ban the killer robots before it's too late by noel sharkey
I completely agree with the author.
Most war annalist say robots have better accuracy than humans on the battlefield. But if you think about it think of all the computer malfunctions. he says "But this is speculation based on assumptions about future developments of computer hardware and software. It is no more than "hope ware" -- since the 1950s, Artificial Intelligence has moved at a snail's pace compared to what proponents have predicted." We also shouldn’t allow robots to decide who lives and dies in a battle field. he says "At this point, we cannot rely on machines having the independent facility to conform to international law. Current sensing systems are not up to the task. And even if machines had adequate sensing mechanisms they would still be missing the vital components of battlefield awareness and common sense reasoning to make decisions about who and when it is appropriate to kill." Robots don’t have common sense like us , they cant make decisions like us cause they aren’t us.
Also robots don’t have morals he says "A robot doesn't have the moral agency to be held accountable." We cant expect robots to make good decisions because they have no morals. They could kill many people that shouldn’t die. Also what if a robot unintentionally causes a war? He says "Is anyone considering how autonomous weapons could destabilize world security and trigger unintentional wars?" What if a robot thought they say an enemy plane but it was actually our allies plane . That could start a outright war .
I completely agree with the author.
Most war annalist say robots have better accuracy than humans on the battlefield. But if you think about it think of all the computer malfunctions. he says "But this is speculation based on assumptions about future developments of computer hardware and software. It is no more than "hope ware" -- since the 1950s, Artificial Intelligence has moved at a snail's pace compared to what proponents have predicted." We also shouldn’t allow robots to decide who lives and dies in a battle field. he says "At this point, we cannot rely on machines having the independent facility to conform to international law. Current sensing systems are not up to the task. And even if machines had adequate sensing mechanisms they would still be missing the vital components of battlefield awareness and common sense reasoning to make decisions about who and when it is appropriate to kill." Robots don’t have common sense like us , they cant make decisions like us cause they aren’t us.
Also robots don’t have morals he says "A robot doesn't have the moral agency to be held accountable." We cant expect robots to make good decisions because they have no morals. They could kill many people that shouldn’t die. Also what if a robot unintentionally causes a war? He says "Is anyone considering how autonomous weapons could destabilize world security and trigger unintentional wars?" What if a robot thought they say an enemy plane but it was actually our allies plane . That could start a outright war .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)